Hmmm, you are using a email address...

Google has declared war on the independent media and has begun blocking emails from NaturalNews from getting to our readers. We recommend as a free, uncensored email receiving service, or as a free, encrypted email send and receive service.

That's okay. Continue with my Gmail address...

Corrupt medical industry now recommending the very same PSA prostate cancer test they already declared to be useless

Sorry, we were wrong, but we still don’t know what is right. That’s the gist of the new U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) advice regarding prostate cancer. Perhaps you remember that in 2012, the USPSTF discouraged prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for men of any age. The group said the test was practically useless, being unable to detect relevant data that would discourage death among men with the disease. But now, USPSTF is backtracking with new draft recommendations that encourage the test after all. But, hold on, they end their guidelines with the suggestion that men should do their own research before deciding anything.

Well, hardy har har, isn’t that what men have been doing since 2012? Several leading medical groups warn that they do not have the answer. Both the USPSTF and the collective health groups say that men have to decide for themselves whether to take an imperfect PSA test or not. These new draft guidelines do not provide any specific advice on the topic. USPSTF chair, Dr. Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo insists that the lack of advice is the best advice. “This isn’t a one-size-fits-all recommendation,” she says in an article on “Other men will realize the likely benefit is small and aren’t willing to risk the harms.”

The harm Dr. Bibbins-Domingo is referring to is the supposed negative effects of PSA screening. The test is a simple blood test that measures a protein produced by the prostate. It is meant to detect prostate cancer, but has been seen to not save lives. If you’re scratching your head right now,  here’s a brief summary of the limitations of the test. In theory, low PSA levels are good and high PSA levels are bad. However, even excluding for age and race, there are other factors that could cause a man’s PSA levels to rise (like an infection or recent ejaculation).

The FDA approved the use of the PSA test in 1994 in conjunction with a digital rectal exam (DRE). Men who undergo PSA testing usually were recommended to take a DRE to further help doctors diagnose the problem correctly. Even then, doctors saw that a number of benign conditions resulted in a high PSA number. These non-cancerous conditions were misdiagnosed, and led to thousands of men undergoing unnecessary radiation or major surgery. The number of false positives caused the USPSTF to not recommend the test at all. (Related: Be kind to yourself by knowing what is real, and what is just misinformation by reading the articles at    

Recently, however, new evidence indicated that routine PSA blood tests can slightly reduce the chances of men dying from prostate cancer. Drastic measures such as radiation or surgery can be avoided with close and active monitoring once the cancer is detected.

Yeah, so now what?

The “solution” (for lack of a better word) for prostate cancer screening is shared decision-making, recommends the task force. Both patients and doctors should work together to come up with the best treatment plan for the specific case. The crucial factor is timing. USPSTF suggests screening should begin at age 55. Other groups say earlier (around 40-45), depending on family history of prostate cancer and other factors. Then there are doctors who discourage testing for men older than 70, while others say that testing should be done continually. The panel leaves this discussion open-ended, merely stating that it has no recommendation, but those with a family history of prostate cancer are at higher risk of developing the disease.

Dr. Eric Klein, chairman of the urology department at the Cleveland Clinic said in the same article, “Having worked in urology before PSA tests in the 1980s, I have personally seen the value, and I will always take the view that it does more good than harm. Of course, it is not necessary for all men. But to say it does not have value [as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force said in 2012] is incorrect, in my opinion.” Dr. Klein said that other than the PSA, there are other effective tests to determine prostate cancer risk such as the OPCO4K, ISOPSA, and the Prostate Health Index, which men should consider. Still, he lauds the new (if somewhat vague) recommendations of the USPSTF.

“The newer recommendation should empower men to be proactive about learning about the benefits and risks of screening and not avoid asking about [prostate cancer]…men should ask for the facts and not be shy about asking to have a PSA ordered if they feel it’s in their best interest to do so,” concluded Dr. Klein.

These new prostate cancer recommendations are open for public comment on the USPSTF website until May 8.

Sources include:

Receive Our Free Email Newsletter

Get independent news alerts on natural cures, food lab tests, cannabis medicine, science, robotics, drones, privacy and more.

comments powered by Disqus